I enjoyed reading ‘The mythology of feedback’ (Adcroft 2011). This
paper questions: do academics and students share the same feedback
mythology? If there is only a limited sharing of feedback mythology, How does the dissonance this creates manifest itself?
For me, the most interest argument in this paper is, ‘effort put into
feedback that is not focused on assessment, despite the investment of
time and resources, is simply not seen as feedback by students’. ‘Students cannot learn from feedback if they do not recognise that
they are receiving feedback or if they are only interested in the marks
they receive on assessed work’.
I agree with 'accurate measurement of feedback effectiveness is difficult and perhaps impossible'(Price et al. 2010).
My feedback approach is:
- Make effort to assist student learning, assist them to achieve their learning goals.
- To do this, understanding the expectation of student is important (I found one minute paper is useful).
- Check if the intended learning outcome and assessment criteria (and
rubric) are really addressing what it claimed to be for the unit
0 件のコメント:
コメントを投稿