Biggs’ model of constructive
alignment (Biggs 1999) which sets out the interdependence of learning
outcomes, teaching (i.e. learning methods) and assessment with, ideally, all
three ‘aligned’ as equal partners in a design triumvirate, in practice one
aspect of the model – that is teaching methods – is habitually privileged over the
other two.
Source: Price, M., Carroll, J., O'Donovan, B.,
& Rust, C. (2011).
In order to make these
holistic judgments teachers need to know what is poor quality performance, what
is good quality and why. Constructive alignment operates on these same
assumptions and addresses how they may work in practice.
Source: Biggs, J.B.,
& Tang, C. (2007).
0 件のコメント:
コメントを投稿