A clear understanding of the intended learning outcomes of the
subject in which the group work occurs is a useful starting point for determining criteria for assessment
of the group work itself. Once these broader learning requirements are
understood, a consideration of how the group tasks, and criteria for assessment
of those tasks, fit into those broad requirements can then follow.
Source : James,
R. McInnes, C. & Devlin, M. (2002)
We teachers might see the
intended learning outcomes as the central pillar in an aligned teaching system,
but our students see otherwise:
In preparing for the
assessments, students will be learning the intended outcomes.
If the intended learning
outcomes are written appropriately, the job of the assessment is to state how
well they have been met, the 'how well' being expressed not in 'marks' but in a
hierarchy of levels, such as letter grades from 'A' to 'D', or as high
distinction through credit to conditional pass, or whatever system of grading
is used.
Source: Biggs, J.B.,
& Tang, C. (2007).
0 件のコメント:
コメントを投稿